• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Captain Digital

Random musings on politics, society, and pop culture from the Internet's marketing curmudgeon.

  • About
  • Politics
  • pop culture
  • Music
  • Media
  • Marketing, Advertising & Branding
  • Related Sites
    • Novel Idea
    • Brad Kozak
You are here: Home / common sense / The People v. Climate Change

The People v. Climate Change

To the Honorable Chief Justice John Roberts and the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States of America:

If it please the court, we hereby submit this petition for an injunction to bind the United States Government from any activity in support of the concept of Climate Change, including, but not limited to, “cap and trade,” “carbon taxes,” “carbon emissions,” and “environmental impact,” either through legislation, executive action, or administrative regulations. We ask the court’s help, due to the fact that Climate Change (nee: “Global Warming,” nee: “Global Cooling”) is so clearly a religion, and therefore violates Article I of the United States Constitution prohibiting the establishment of religion and abridging freedom of speech or of the press. 

Clearly and undeniably, proponents of the Religion of Climate Change have used Congress, the Administrative branch, and the courts to enforce the tenets of their beliefs on others. It is also indisputable that they have, with malice aforethought, attempted to silence critics and abridge the freedom of speech of those who would speak out against this cult and their behaviors.

We ask for emergency relief, with an injunction against any further interference by the government on this religion’s behalf.

By definition, any religion shares common characteristics, these being a deity, prophets, one or more high priests, sacraments, and one or more holy scriptures, as well as priests or other ordained ministers, laypersons, and a congregation of believers. Organized religions also share two more characteristics – religious broadcasts and the condemnation of apostates. We will prove to the court that Climate Change conforms to this characterization, and is indeed a religion, by any reasonable metric.

  • Climate Change’s deity is Gaia, more popularly known as “Mother Earth.”
  • Among Climate Change’s prophets are Svante Arrhenius, Michael Mann, and James Lovelock.
  • There are many high priests of Climate Change, but above all else stand Al Gore.
  • The holy texts of Climate Change are many, but the book “Earth in the Balance” and the documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” (both by Al Gore) stand out as two considered Holy Writ by believers.
  • The priesthood of Climate Change is filled by researchers (funded by taxpayer dollars) and politicians (ditto).
  • The laity of Climate Change is dominated by television news and commentary personnel, along with commentators and personalities, both on television and in print.
  • Virtually any newscast from the mainstream media constitutes a religious broadcast.
  • And the near-universal condemnation, criticism and personal attacks on those who dare stand up to the Climate Change believers are either characterized as “apostates,” “non-believers” or “sinners.”

In short, Climate Change IS a religion, and as a religion, the government is bound by the words of the first amendment of the Constitution and may not endorse or in any way force the adoption of such a religion on the people of the United States of America.

Respectfully submitted,

We the People

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Print

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Clapton Strikes a Blow for Common Sense
  • Everything I needed to know about Marketing, I learned from Penguins.
  • Woka-Cola.
  • The Black Lives Matter Show!
  • Lies, Damned Lies, and The Media.

Recent Comments

  • Kar on Why I used to like Garrison Keillor.
  • Disruption in the Telecom industry — Emerging trends. • Mooncascade Blog on TV is dead. Long live TV!
  • Tom on Everything I needed to know about Marketing, I learned from Penguins.
  • Pale Aiken on A Plan for Guns That Works.
  • Leah on Are Color Palettes Racist?

Archives

  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • October 2014
  • July 2013
  • February 2013
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2010
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • February 2005

Categories

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Advertising
  • Automotive
  • Branding
  • common sense
  • Computer Programming
  • Computers & Electronics
  • Current Events, Society & the Law
  • Economy & Finance
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Graphic Design
  • Humor
  • Legal
  • Marketing
  • Marketing, Advertising & Branding
  • Media
  • Music
  • Politics
  • pop culture
  • Random Stuff
  • Religion & Morality
  • Satire
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • Travel
  • U.S. Constitution
  • Uncategorized
  • Visual Arts

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.