• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Captain Digital

Random musings on politics, society, and pop culture from the Internet's marketing curmudgeon.

  • About
  • Politics
  • pop culture
  • Music
  • Media
  • Marketing, Advertising & Branding
  • Related Sites
    • Novel Idea
    • Brad Kozak
You are here: Home / Current Events, Society & the Law / D.C.: the Solomon Solution

D.C.: the Solomon Solution

An incisive decision.
An incisive decision.

Remember Solomon? For those of you who aren’t big Bible fans, Solomon was an Old Testament ruler – King of the Hebrews – who was renowned for his wisdom. In fact, the phrase “Wisdom of Solomon” indicates somebody that is very, very wise. King Solomon’s most famous decision was a ruling regarding a baby and dueling mothers. As the tale goes, one mother had rolled over in the night, accidentally smothering her newborn. To deal with her loss, she claimed that another woman’s baby was her own. In an era thousands of years before DNA, Solomon was asked to decide to which mother the living baby actually belonged.

Solomon considered the matter, interviewing both of the plaintiffs. His decision was to slice the baby in two, giving one half to each mother. The pretender readily agreed to the scheme, whereas the baby’s natural mother wailed in anguish at the plan.

Just for grins, let’s consider that wisdom against the issue in the national spotlight that concerns Washington D.C. You see, when the District of Columbia was originally created, it was designed to solve a problem that faced our founders, namely, which state would get to host the nation’s capitol. The answer was to create a new city from scratch, carving the land from both Maryland and Virginia – resulting in an autonomous region that would function only as a city, and not as a state.

The problem, of course, is that nobody stopped to think about those that might choose to live in D.C. Because D.C. is not a state, those that live in D.C. have no U.S. Senators or Representatives that represent them. (You could argue that every member of Congress represents them, but that dog no longer hunts it would seem.)

The residents of Washington D.C. occupy the far left of the political spectrum, and if it’s anything that the Left hates is a bunch of left-wing voters that can’t help them maintain a majority. They claim that it’s unconstitutional to prevent the citizens of Washington D. C. from having voting representation in the halls of Congress (they have Congressional reps – they just can’t vote). The Dems in Congress have proposed that they pass a bill that would change that, giving D.C. two Senators and one Representative.

As much as my heart bleeds for D.C. voters, there’s a little thing called the U.S. Constitution that’s getting in the way of this bill. Specifically, the U. S. Constitution requires that Congressmen come from “the Sates” – not districts. Bummer. But I have an idea that will give each voter representation that actually has the right to vote in the halls of Congress. And the solution is remarkably similar to that of Solomon of old.

Divide D.C. down the middle. Half the voters vote in Maryland for Federal elections. Half vote in Virginia. They continue to vote as a city for local elections, but when it comes to national votes, they become citizens of one of the two nearest states. No new Senators. No new Representatives. No change in the balance of power. The voters become instantly, fully “franchised.”

Of course, this solution makes waaaaaaaaaaaaay too much sense to fly inside the Beltway. But it’s the right thing to do – cut that baby in half, and give each half to a state. We’d solve the problem, avoid a constitutional crisis, and duck some expensive lawsuits.

Now if we could just come up with similarly elegant solutions for the border, the budget, and the bailouts…

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Print

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. citizenw says

    March 29, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    Except that, if you were REALLY familiar with the issue, you.d know that Virginia's portion of DC was returned at their request in the mid 1840's. It is what is now known as Arlington, Alexandria, etc., Va.

    What is now known as DC was once part of Maryland, which doesn't WANT it back.

    Reply
  2. citizenw says

    March 29, 2009 at 7:39 pm

    Except that, if you were REALLY familiar with the issue, you.d know that Virginia's portion of DC was returned at their request in the mid 1840's. It is what is now known as Arlington, Alexandria, etc., Va.

    What is now known as DC was once part of Maryland, which doesn't WANT it back.

    Reply
  3. citizenw says

    March 29, 2009 at 11:38 pm

    Except that, if you were REALLY familiar with the issue, you.d know that Virginia's portion of DC was returned at their request in the mid 1840's. It is what is now known as Arlington, Alexandria, etc., Va.

    What is now known as DC was once part of Maryland, which doesn't WANT it back.

    Reply
  4. citizenw says

    March 29, 2009 at 11:39 pm

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Clapton Strikes a Blow for Common Sense
  • Everything I needed to know about Marketing, I learned from Penguins.
  • Woka-Cola.
  • The Black Lives Matter Show!
  • Lies, Damned Lies, and The Media.

Recent Comments

  • Kar on Why I used to like Garrison Keillor.
  • Disruption in the Telecom industry — Emerging trends. • Mooncascade Blog on TV is dead. Long live TV!
  • Tom on Everything I needed to know about Marketing, I learned from Penguins.
  • Pale Aiken on A Plan for Guns That Works.
  • Leah on Are Color Palettes Racist?

Archives

  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • October 2014
  • July 2013
  • February 2013
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2010
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • February 2005

Categories

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Advertising
  • Automotive
  • Branding
  • common sense
  • Computer Programming
  • Computers & Electronics
  • Current Events, Society & the Law
  • Economy & Finance
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Graphic Design
  • Humor
  • Legal
  • Marketing
  • Marketing, Advertising & Branding
  • Media
  • Music
  • Politics
  • pop culture
  • Random Stuff
  • Religion & Morality
  • Satire
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • Travel
  • U.S. Constitution
  • Uncategorized
  • Visual Arts

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.