• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Captain Digital

Random musings on politics, society, and pop culture from the Internet's marketing curmudgeon.

  • About
  • Politics
  • pop culture
  • Music
  • Media
  • Marketing, Advertising & Branding
  • Related Sites
    • Novel Idea
    • Brad Kozak
You are here: Home / Marketing, Advertising & Branding / Advertising / Hunting Pwospects!

Hunting Pwospects!

Elmer Fudd & Prospect.Marketing – or more specifically, the “advertising” part of marketing – is a lot like hunting. In this case, you’re hunting prospects, and not rabbits, but the principles are the same. Hunters have, basically, two types of firearms from which to choose – shotguns and rifles. In marketing, most customers prefer the shotgun approach. Savvy marketers prefer rifles. Here’s why…

A shotgun provides a wide coverage area, but doesn’t give you a lot of distance. In non-hunter terms, that means when you aim at something, it’s hard to miss, but you don’t get a lot of penetration. Unless your target is pretty close, you might hit it, but you won’t bring it down. You’ll also hit everything near it, like it or not.

A rifle can hit your target (and generally take it down) but if you don’t aim precisely, you miss it entirely. A rifle hits a single target (or with the right kind of round, the target and whatever’s immediately behind the target.

In marketing, the shotgun approach is typified by ads that try to sell you on the entire product line. They have a lot of copy, and try to detail every feature. Something like: “Introducing Product A! [insert everything you could possibly want to know about Product A here.] And don’t forget, we also offer Product B, C & D! [tell them all about products B, C & D, even if these products appeal to a completely different market and are of no interest to prospects for Product A – after all…why spend money advertising one thing, when you can advertise EVERYthing?!]

The rifle approach is different. You target one product, and generally one demographic group. That doesn’t prevent other prospect groups from seeing your ad, or being interested in it. Nor does it prevent consumers from making a cognitive leap of faith, by thinking “gee…I’m not interested in Product A, but it sounds like these guys have got it going on…I wonder if they make something that I WOULD be interested in”?

Shotgun marketing seems as if it’s less expensive. It’s not. It’s a complete waste of money. It blurs the focus of your marketing. It wastes money telling people about products for which they have no interest. It makes your marketing look amateurish at best, impotent at worst.

Rifle marketing hunts down and bags prospects efficiently. It may <em>look </em>less efficient, but it’s not. And even though you may be targeting only one, narrowly-defined demographic group, you may find that there’s a “halo effect” that grabs a much larger audience than you’d anticipated.

Don’t believe it? Let me give you an example.

In the 1960’s the soft drink market was dominated by one brand. Coca-Cola. Everybody else was an also-ran. Pepsi-Cola was the largest of the little guys, but their market share was dwarfed by Coke. They spent the money they had on trying to appeal to everyone, just like Coke did. But Pepsi didn’t have the ad budget to out-market Coke. What to do? Their ad agency came up with an idea: give up on marketing to everyone, and target one, specific, demographic group. Kids. What did Pepsi do?

Frankly, at first they thought this was a colossally stupid idea. They had no intention of giving up on the adult beverage market. They thought going after kids was juvenile, embarrassing, and just plain idiotic. Their agency explained that the youth market was one they could focus on and dominate, unlike the general market. Plus, kids have a tendency to grow up, and habits that are acquired early in life are frequently carried forth into adulthood. Pepsi bought off on it. The result was “The Pepsi Generation” campaign. But here’s what they didn’t realize at first…

The youth market is NOT just comprised of kids. Sure, there’s kids in the youth market, but there are also people that want everybody to believe they are still young (the mid-life crisis crowd) and those that want to act young (the senior citizen bunch). Newsflash: That’s pretty much everybody. And as Pepsi found out, their youth-oriented campaign ended up targeting just about everybody. Pepsi’s market share grew. Coke’s shrunk. Coke panicked, and thus we lived through the debacle that was “New Coke.” Today, Coke is still #1, but Pepsi is nipping at their heels, and is a strong #2.

The next time you think about advertising your brand, your product, or your service, think about shotgun versus rifle marketing. Resist the temptation to advertise everything you’ve got to everyone. Focus your ads, then narrow your focus. The results, my little Nimrod, might surprise you.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Print

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Clapton Strikes a Blow for Common Sense
  • Everything I needed to know about Marketing, I learned from Penguins.
  • Woka-Cola.
  • The Black Lives Matter Show!
  • Lies, Damned Lies, and The Media.

Recent Comments

  • Kar on Why I used to like Garrison Keillor.
  • Disruption in the Telecom industry — Emerging trends. • Mooncascade Blog on TV is dead. Long live TV!
  • Tom on Everything I needed to know about Marketing, I learned from Penguins.
  • Pale Aiken on A Plan for Guns That Works.
  • Leah on Are Color Palettes Racist?

Archives

  • July 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • July 2016
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • October 2014
  • July 2013
  • February 2013
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2010
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • February 2005

Categories

  • 2nd Amendment
  • Advertising
  • Automotive
  • Branding
  • common sense
  • Computer Programming
  • Computers & Electronics
  • Current Events, Society & the Law
  • Economy & Finance
  • Education
  • Entertainment
  • Environment
  • Graphic Design
  • Humor
  • Legal
  • Marketing
  • Marketing, Advertising & Branding
  • Media
  • Music
  • Politics
  • pop culture
  • Random Stuff
  • Religion & Morality
  • Satire
  • Technology
  • Terrorism
  • Travel
  • U.S. Constitution
  • Uncategorized
  • Visual Arts

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.